Hello Peter,
21.09.2021 00:03, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 1:35 PM Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> wrote:
> Before commit 3c3b8a4b our failing offset number would have at least
> found an LP_UNUSED item -- so no assertion failure. After that commit
> the offset's line pointer might actually be positioned "past the end
> of the line pointer array". But that is a valid state for a heap
> page/HOT chain to have -- so the assertion has it wrong.
>
> I'll push a fix soon. Thanks for the report!
Thanks for the fix!
But if that is a valid (or sane) state, then shouldn't the comment "Some
sanity checks" be removed (or updated) too?
Best regards,
Alexander
