Thank you, pushed.
Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> I noticed that we're calling _bt_nonkey_truncate() needlessly when a
> minimum key is needed at the leftmost page on each level of the tree.
> This was always a special case, and I think that it should remain as
> one. Attached patch avoids unneeded truncations, while preserving the
> generic BTreeTupleGetNAtts() assertions.
>
> This isn't a correctness issue, and the extra overhead of unneeded
> truncation should be negligible, but what we have now seems confusing
> to me.
>
--
Teodor Sigaev E-mail: teodor@sigaev.ru
WWW: http://www.sigaev.ru/