Re: ON CONFLICT DO UPDATE for partitioned tables - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Langote
Subject Re: ON CONFLICT DO UPDATE for partitioned tables
Date
Msg-id f6c11141-9569-7b0f-eb24-061baef44c9f@lab.ntt.co.jp
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: ON CONFLICT DO UPDATE for partitioned tables  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>)
Responses Re: ON CONFLICT DO UPDATE for partitioned tables  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2018/04/18 0:04, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Amit Langote wrote:
> 
>> I just confirmed my hunch that this wouldn't somehow do the right thing
>> when the OID system column is involved.  Like this case:
> 
> This looks too big a patch to pursue now.  I'm inclined to just remove
> the equalTupdesc changes.

OK.  Here is the patch that removes equalTupdesc optimization.

I will add the rest of the patch to the next CF after starting a new
thread for it sometime later.

Thanks,
Amit

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Langote
Date:
Subject: Re: ON CONFLICT DO UPDATE for partitioned tables
Next
From: Thomas Munro
Date:
Subject: Re: Excessive PostmasterIsAlive calls slow down WAL redo