Re: [HACKERS] Documentation improvements for partitioning - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Langote
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Documentation improvements for partitioning
Date
Msg-id f54f62c9-562f-a97e-7f86-40cacef804cb@lab.ntt.co.jp
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Documentation improvements for partitioning  (Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Documentation improvements for partitioning  (Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2017/02/21 12:10, Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
> I think, that's a limitation till we implement global indexes. But
> nothing in the current implementation stops us from implementing it.
> In fact, I remember, a reply from Robert to another thread on
> partitioning started in parallel to Amit's thread had explained some
> of these design decisions. I am unable to find link to that exact
> reply though.

Are you perhaps thinking of the message titled "design for a partitioning
feature (was: inheritance)" a few months back:

https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CA+TgmoZeV0nryvw9cNB81xdOJg4XtpJMKDif0zTo-GdLcOCgcQ@mail.gmail.com

Thanks,
Amit





pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Rafia Sabih
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Passing query string to workers
Next
From: Ashutosh Bapat
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Documentation improvements for partitioning