On Fri, 2020-07-17 at 05:21 +0000, tsunakawa.takay@fujitsu.com wrote:
> From: Masahiko Sawada <masahiko.sawada@2ndquadrant.com>
> I have briefly checked the only oracle_fdw but in general I think that
> > if an existing FDW supports transaction begin, commit, and rollback,
> > these can be ported to new FDW transaction APIs easily.
>
> Does oracle_fdw support begin, commit and rollback?
Yes.
> And most importantly, do other major DBMSs, including Oracle, provide the API for
> preparing a transaction? In other words, will the FDWs other than postgres_fdw
> really be able to take advantage of the new FDW functions to join the 2PC processing?
> I think we need to confirm that there are concrete examples.
I bet they do. There is even a standard for that.
I am not looking forward to adapting oracle_fdw, and I didn't read the patch.
But using distributed transactions is certainly a good thing if it is done right.
The trade off is the need for a transaction manager, and implementing that
correctly is a high price to pay.
Yours,
Laurenz Albe
