Re: Regarding postgreSQL performance on DRAM - Mailing list pgsql-admin

From Thomas Kellerer
Subject Re: Regarding postgreSQL performance on DRAM
Date
Msg-id f37b7ea7-966d-d54a-bf8d-a1c7229e5f8a@gmx.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Regarding postgreSQL performance on DRAM  (Jerry Sievers <gsievers19@comcast.net>)
Responses Re: Regarding postgreSQL performance on DRAM  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-admin
Jerry Sievers schrieb am 20.02.2019 um 21:19:
>> My workload is simple. I  insert 1 million rows into a table with 100
>> columns, where each column is 256 bytes in length, and every 10
>> inserts are batched into a transaction.
> 
> Your test workload qualifies for TOASTing due to the $unrealistically
> long physical tuple size.

Hmm. I though TOAST is only applied to single values, not the entire tuple (row)?

As each column is substantially shorter than the TOAST threshold, I would not expect toasting to kick in here.

Or am I missing something?




pgsql-admin by date:

Previous
From: Jerry Sievers
Date:
Subject: Re: Regarding postgreSQL performance on DRAM
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Regarding postgreSQL performance on DRAM