On 2021/11/22 13:59, Bharath Rupireddy wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 8:17 AM Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com> wrote:
>>> Well, in that case, why can't we get rid of "(message_primary != NULL"
>>> and just have "message_primary[0] != '\0' ? errmsg_internal("%s",
>>> message_primary) : errmsg("could not obtain message string for remote
>>> error")" ?
>>
>> That's possible if we can confirm that PQerrorMessage() never returns
>> NULL all the cases. I'm not sure how much it's worth doing that, though..
>> It seems more robust to check also NULL there.
>
> Okay.
>
>>> BTW, we might have to fix it in dblink_res_error too?
>>
>> Yeah, that's good idea. I included that change in the patch. Attached.
>
> Thanks. pgfdw_report_error_v2 patch looks good to me.
Pushed. Thanks!
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
Advanced Computing Technology Center
Research and Development Headquarters
NTT DATA CORPORATION
