Re: insensitive collations - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: insensitive collations
Date
Msg-id f2b3b8e8-12c4-ceb7-6803-b4af6eb2cb71@2ndquadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: insensitive collations  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: insensitive collations  ("Daniel Verite" <daniel@manitou-mail.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 16/01/2019 21:50, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 16/01/2019 14:20, Daniel Verite wrote:
>> I've found another issue with aggregates over distinct:
>> the deduplication seems to ignore the collation.
> 
> I have a fix for that.  I'll send it with the next update.

Another patch.  This fixes your issue, and it incorporates the findings
from the thread "ExecBuildGroupingEqual versus collations", as well as a
few other fixes and more tests.

As far as I can tell, this covers everything now, meaning all the
relevant plan types propagate the collation correctly and all the
relevant operators and functions do the right things with them.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: using expression syntax for partition bounds
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: Simplify set of flags used by MyXactFlags