On 2020-08-25 20:36, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> We are inconsistently about adding a comma after e.g. and i.e.:
[..]
> Virtually all American style guides recommend to follow both “i.e.”
> and
> “e.g.” with a comma (just like if “that is” and “for example” were
> used
> instead), so the very same sentence in American English would become:
>
> So, what do we want to do? Leave it unchanged, or pick one of these
> styles?
For what it's worth, I am in favor of that comma.
Erik Rijkers
