Re: CREATE COLLATION without LOCALE throws error in v15 - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Jeff Davis
Subject Re: CREATE COLLATION without LOCALE throws error in v15
Date
Msg-id f1e8eb753d667afd65a10223ed528077c1421a3c.camel@j-davis.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: CREATE COLLATION without LOCALE throws error in v15  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com>)
Responses Re: CREATE COLLATION without LOCALE throws error in v15
Re: CREATE COLLATION without LOCALE throws error in v15
List pgsql-bugs
On Thu, 2022-12-08 at 19:29 +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> The harm is that in the context of database-level collations, the
> analogous syntax means something different.

I see. I certainly agree that we shouldn't document the
lc_ctype=lc_collate hack for CREATE COLLATION for the ICU provider,
because we don't want to encourage it.

Kyle, perhaps after the docs are updated, you can reach out to the
npgsql project to see if they can fix it on their side?


--
Jeff Davis
PostgreSQL Contributor Team - AWS





pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: CREATE COLLATION without LOCALE throws error in v15
Next
From: Kyle Spearrin
Date:
Subject: Re: CREATE COLLATION without LOCALE throws error in v15