Re: CREATE COLLATION without LOCALE throws error in v15 - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Kyle Spearrin
Subject Re: CREATE COLLATION without LOCALE throws error in v15
Date
Msg-id CALDQics4UZL8cZLT75mzTPAJYes3kQ5AvxyWhwFmYpMM+NJedQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: CREATE COLLATION without LOCALE throws error in v15  (Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>)
List pgsql-bugs
Jeff,
It appears npgsql has already addressed it in an upcoming version, which we are awaiting:
https://github.com/npgsql/efcore.pg/issues/2527

--
Kyle Spearrin

Follow Bitwarden on social media:


On Thu, Dec 8, 2022 at 2:59 PM Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com> wrote:
On Thu, 2022-12-08 at 19:29 +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> The harm is that in the context of database-level collations, the
> analogous syntax means something different.

I see. I certainly agree that we shouldn't document the
lc_ctype=lc_collate hack for CREATE COLLATION for the ICU provider,
because we don't want to encourage it.

Kyle, perhaps after the docs are updated, you can reach out to the
npgsql project to see if they can fix it on their side?


--
Jeff Davis
PostgreSQL Contributor Team - AWS


pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Jeff Davis
Date:
Subject: Re: CREATE COLLATION without LOCALE throws error in v15
Next
From: Justin Baur
Date:
Subject: Re: CREATE COLLATION without LOCALE throws error in v15