On 2/6/21 02:32, Tom Lane wrote:
> I wrote:
>> I think a preferable fix involves making sure that the correct
>> record-type typmod is propagated to record_in in this context.
>> Alternatively, maybe we could insert the foreign table's rowtype
>> during execution of the input operation, without touching the
>> plan as such.
>
> Here's a draft-quality patch based on that idea. It resolves
> the offered test case, but I haven't beat on it beyond that.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
I played with your patch and couldn't find any errors. But what if ROW
operation were allowed to be pushed to a foreign server?
Potentially, I can imagine pushed-down JOIN with arbitrary ROW function
in its target list.
Amit's approach looks more safe for me.
--
regards,
Andrey Lepikhov
Postgres Professional
