"Tom Lane" <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> д���ʼ�
news:15998.1176303488@sss.pgh.pa.us...
> "Jacky Leng" <lengjianquan@163.com> writes:
> > Cann't we remove this param?
>
> No.
>
> > We can rewrite like this:
> > 1.XLogReadBuffer:
> > * remove init;
> > * everytime we cann't read a block, just "log_invalid_page" it, and
return
> > InvalidBuffer;
>
> Your proposal degrades the robustness of the system by turning non-error
> cases into errors. If the caller is able to rewrite the page fully, we
> should not report an error when it's not available to read.
Oh, I see, but how about my second question, is it possible?
If it happens:
1. the second rel's pages' lsn surely is lager than xlog records of the
first rel;
2. so it's possible some xlog record are not redoed;
3. but those pages that can be rewrite fully are rewrited unconditionaly,
If I do a PITR recovery now, is there any trouble?----The file contains both
old rels'data and new rel's.
Am I wrong?
