On 4/19/2017 12:31 AM, vinny wrote:
> Given the number of records, my first thought was either partitioning
> or partial-indexes.
> The fewer rows are in the index, the quicker it will be to check,
> and it's not a lot of work to create separate indexes for lat/long
> ranges or dates.
that only works if the planner can figure out which partitions to use in
advance, otherwise it ends up having to scan all the partitions.
--
john r pierce, recycling bits in santa cruz
