On 15/11/2022 2:58 pm, Adrian Klaver wrote:
> On 11/15/22 10:54 AM, Frank Cazabon wrote:
>>
>> On 15/11/2022 2:44 pm, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Frank Cazabon <frank.cazabon@gmail.com> writes:
>>>> If however I have a function defined like this
>>>> CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION public.testfunction(
>>>> )
>>>> RETURNS TABLE
>>>> (
>>>> Firstname character(30)
>>>> )
>>>> LANGUAGE 'plpgsql'
>>>> AS $BODY$
>>>> BEGIN
>>>> RETURN QUERY SELECT p.cFirstName FROM patients p;
>>>> END;
>>>> $BODY$;
>>>> And I call:
>>>> SELECT * FROM public.testFunction();
>>>> Then FirstName returns as a Memo field (similar to a Text field).
>>> This is mostly about whatever software stack you're using on the
>>> client side --- Memo is certainly not something Postgres knows about.
>>>
>>>> Any idea what I need to do to get it to return the character(30) type?
>>> There's no chance of getting back the "30" part with this structure,
>>> because function signatures do not carry length restrictions.
>>> What I expect is happening is that you get firstname as an
>>> unspecified-length "character" type, and something on the client
>>> side is deciding to cope with that by calling it "Memo" instead.
>>>
>>> You could perhaps work around that by defining a named composite
>>> type:
>>>
>>> create type testfunction_result as (firstname character(30), ...);
>>>
>>> create function testfunction() returns setof testfunction_result as ...
>>>
>>> regards, tom lane
>> Thanks, so I could define the function like this - removed the (30):
>>
>> CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION public.testfunction(
>> )
>> RETURNS TABLE
>> (
>> Firstname character
>> )
>> LANGUAGE 'plpgsql'
>
> No you don't want to do that:
>
> select 'test'::char;
> bpchar
> --------
> t
>
> vs
>
> select 'test'::varchar;
> varchar
> ---------
> test
>
> Besides you missed the important part, after creating the type
> testfunction_result:
>
> create function testfunction() returns setof testfunction_result as ...
>
Sorry about the confusion, I have got it working using the type definition.
Thanks for the help
>
>>
>> I'll try the type definition and see if that helps.
>>
>>
>
>
