Re: different engine for JIT - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Adrien Nayrat
Subject Re: different engine for JIT
Date
Msg-id edf80448-2c12-42c5-9d30-62fad91f0167@anayrat.info
Whole thread Raw
In response to different engine for JIT  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 5/3/24 10:07 AM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> Hi
> 
> I found https://github.com/vnmakarov/mir?tab=readme-ov-file 
> <https://github.com/vnmakarov/mir?tab=readme-ov-file>
> 
> It should be significantly faster than llvm (compilation).
> 
> Regards
> 
> Pavel

Hello,

I can't tell about JIT, it is too complicated for me ^^

Fwiw, Pierre Ducroquet wrote an article about another (faster) 
implementation:
https://www.pinaraf.info/2024/03/look-ma-i-wrote-a-new-jit-compiler-for-postgresql/

Xing Guo replied to his article by mentioning another two prototypes :

– https://github.com/higuoxing/pg_slowjithttps://github.com/higuoxing/pg_asmjit

It is good to see interest in this area. Current implementation is quite 
expensive and costing model risky. If often recommend disabling it and 
enabling it when it is really needed. (It is disabled by default on AWS).

Regards,

-- 
Adrien NAYRAT





pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: tablecmds.c/MergeAttributes() cleanup
Next
From: Ashutosh Bapat
Date:
Subject: Re: tablecmds.c/MergeAttributes() cleanup