On 2018/12/18 15:02, Michael Paquier wrote: > On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 02:51:10PM +0900, Amit Langote wrote: >> The link you shared is broken, so I couldn't read that email to understand >> the relation of relfilenode removal optimization to the bug here or how a >> TAP test was deployed for it. > > Oops. And here you go: > https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20181114.124736.206988673.horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp Thanks. I looked at: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/attachment/65997/v4-0001-TAP-test-for-copy-truncation-optimization.patch and I now get it. Adding a TAP test to src/test/recovery might make sense, but I'm not completely sure. In this case, we don't really want to see if the WAL-skipping optimization works correctly but that it's correctly *disabled* for foreign tables. Thanks, Amit
pgsql-bugs by date:
Соглашаюсь с условиями обработки персональных данных