Re: [DOCS] Stats views and functions not in order? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: [DOCS] Stats views and functions not in order?
Date
Msg-id ed11e858-12e9-2a9f-3091-d887a544f1a6@enterprisedb.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [DOCS] Stats views and functions not in order?  (Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [DOCS] Stats views and functions not in order?
List pgsql-hackers
On 11.01.23 07:11, Peter Smith wrote:
> v9-0003 --> v10-0001
> 
>> I'm not sure if anything is pending for v9-0003, if there is something
>> pending, please post an updated patch for the same.
> 
> Thanks for the reminder. PSA v10.

So this patch changes some sections describing system views to 
refentry's.  What is the reason for that?  refentry's are basically man 
pages; do we want man pages for each system view?

Maybe (*), but then we should also do the same to all the other system 
views, all the system catalogs, everything else.  Just changing a few in 
a single place seems odd.

(*) -- but also maybe not?




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jelte Fennema
Date:
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Support load balancing in libpq
Next
From: Dean Rasheed
Date:
Subject: Re: Add proper planner support for ORDER BY / DISTINCT aggregates