On 2018/05/15 2:29, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> On 2018-May-10, Amit Langote wrote:
>
>> How about we error out even *before* calling DefineIndex for the 1st time?
>> I see that ProcessUtilitySlow() gets a list of all partitions when
>> locking them for index creation before calling DefineIndex. Maybe, just
>> go through the list and error out if one of them is a partition that we
>> don't support creating an index on?
>
> The overwhelming consensus seems to be for this option, so I pushed your
> patch after some small tweaks -- mostly to simplify unnecessarily
> baroque code. (I must have been thinking that recursion would happen
> right in ProcessUtilitySlow. That doesn't match my memories, but I
> can't explain this code otherwise.) I added a very small test too.
Thank you.
> I think it'd be better to take this out of ProcessUtility also and into
> DefineInde, for cleanliness sake; maybe add a 'recursing' flag to
> DefineIndex. Not for pg11, though.
Agreed. Most of the stuff in utility.c is for command dispatch and there
is no reason for this partitioning-related bit to be sitting here. Moving
it will require perhaps non-trivial adjustment of indexcmds.c code, so
let's leave it for later as you say.
Thanks,
Amit
