Re: Interrupts vs signals - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Heikki Linnakangas
Subject Re: Interrupts vs signals
Date
Msg-id ea0a4c74-5f1c-4339-8383-208ce305f282@iki.fi
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Interrupts vs signals  (Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 06/03/2025 02:47, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> Here's a new patch set. It includes the previous work, and also goes the 
> whole hog and replaces procsignals and many other signalling with 
> interrupts. It's based on Thomas's v3-0002-Redesign-interrupts-remove- 
> ProcSignals.patch much earlier in this thread.

And here's yet another version. It's the same at high level, but with a 
ton of little fixes.

One notable change is that I merged storage/interrupt.[ch] with 
postmaster/interrupt.[ch], so the awkwardness of having two files with 
same name is gone.

-- 
Heikki Linnakangas
Neon (https://neon.tech)

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Melanie Plageman
Date:
Subject: Re: Log connection establishment timings
Next
From: Nikhil Kumar Veldanda
Date:
Subject: Re: ZStandard (with dictionaries) compression support for TOAST compression