Re: automating perl compile time checking - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: automating perl compile time checking
Date
Msg-id ea096bb5-f1cb-2999-494a-5932f660f5ff@2ndQuadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: automating perl compile time checking  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers

On 06/11/2018 03:38 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>
> On 06/11/2018 02:33 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> On 2018-Jun-05, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>>
>>>> On 5 Jun 2018, at 16:31, Andrew Dunstan 
>>>> <andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>>>> The patch contains a simple script to run the checks. The code that 
>>>> finds perl files is put in a function in a single file that is 
>>>> sourced by the three locations that need it.
>>> +1 on centralizing the find-files function.
>> +1 on that.  Why do we need to make the new find_perl_files file
>> executable, given it's always sourced?  (I would have given a .sh
>> extension because it's a lib not an executable, but I suppose that's
>> just matter of taste; we certainly don't have a policy about it).
>>
>> Looks fine to me either way.
>>
>
>
> I've committed this, but I'm fine if people want to tweak the names. 
> It probably doesn't need to be executable.
>
>


People might be interested to see the perlcritic and 'perl -cw" checks 
in operation:

https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_stage_log.pl?nm=crake&dt=2018-06-11%2021%3A47%3A18&stg=perl-check

The module isn't actually using the scripts in src/tools/perlcheck, 
because they are designed to be quiet and it's designed to be more 
verbose, but apart from that it's doing exactly the same thing.

cheers

andrew

-- 
Andrew Dunstan                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: why partition pruning doesn't work?
Next
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: why partition pruning doesn't work?