Re: adding partitioned tables to publications - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Petr Jelinek
Subject Re: adding partitioned tables to publications
Date
Msg-id e934a27d-bab4-b818-8936-bbcd2d41df0a@2ndquadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: adding partitioned tables to publications  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: adding partitioned tables to publications  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 03/04/2020 16:59, Tom Lane wrote:
> Petr Jelinek <petr@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
>> AFAIK gcov can't handle multiple instances of same process being started
>> as it just overwrites the coverage files. So for TAP test it will report
>> bogus info (as in some code that's executed will look as not executed).
> 
> Hm, really?  I routinely run "make check" (ie, parallel regression
> tests) under coverage, and I get results that seem sane.  If I were
> losing large chunks of the data, I think I'd have noticed.
> 

Parallel regression still just starts single postgres instance no?

-- 
Petr Jelinek
2ndQuadrant - PostgreSQL Solutions for the Enterprise
https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: adding partitioned tables to publications
Next
From: Etsuro Fujita
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] advanced partition matching algorithm forpartition-wise join