Re: ALTER TABLE ADD FOREIGN KEY to partitioned table, is not parallelized - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Frédéric Yhuel
Subject Re: ALTER TABLE ADD FOREIGN KEY to partitioned table, is not parallelized
Date
Msg-id e89cfa42-edeb-431e-b33a-881556583666@dalibo.com
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: ALTER TABLE ADD FOREIGN KEY to partitioned table, is not parallelized
List pgsql-performance

On 6/3/25 17:34, Dimitrios Apostolou wrote:
> The backend process for each of the above ALTER TABLE commands, does not
>    parallelize the foreign key checks for the different partitions. I
>    know, because in the logs I see gigabytes of temporary files being
>    written, with the CONTEXT showing queries issued incrementally on
>    all the different partitions:
> 
>    :LOG:      temporary file: path "pg_tblspc/16390/PG_17_202406281/ 
> pgsql_tmp/pgsql_tmp3363462.579", size 1073741824
>    :CONTEXT:  SQL statement "SELECT fk."columnX" FROM ONLY 
> "public"."table_partition_214" fk
>               LEFT OUTER JOIN ONLY "public"."another_table" pk
>                   ON ( pk."columnX" OPERATOR(pg_catalog.=) fk."columnX")
>               WHERE pk."columnX" IS NULL AND (fk."columnX" IS NOT NULL)"
> 
>    Why can't the backend issue these queries in parallel workers?

This has been discussed here: 
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/0d21e3b4-dcde-290c-875e-6ed5013e8e52%40dalibo.com

Perhaps we should exhume this patch, but I believe the optimal strategy 
is to perform a VACUUM between the data and post-data to build the 
visibility map. The anti-join can then use an efficient index-only scan.

Best regards,
Frédéric




pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: "Mahdi Bahrami"
Date:
Subject: Re: Database creation performance drop going from pg 14 to pg 15+
Next
From: Dimitrios Apostolou
Date:
Subject: Re: ALTER TABLE ADD FOREIGN KEY to partitioned table, is not parallelized