On 8/14/07, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote:
> All,
>
> > Actually very few RDBMS support transactional DDL, though right this
> > second I do not remember what they do in case you issue DDL inside a
> > transaction. I would assume/hope that they give you an error and not do
> > an implicit commit.
>
> Speaking of which, we should make a big point of our transactional DDL as a
> feature. It's something that even some of the big proprietary DBs don't
> have.
I second that. Non-transactional DDL has been seriously bugging me in
dealings with Oracle lately.
- Yet Another Josh
