"Tom Lane" <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote
>
> Hm? I don't see any improvement there:
>
I was referening this sentence, though I am not sure why that's the
expectation:
>
> "Bruce Momjian" <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> wrote
> If the patch worked, the first and third times will be similar, and
> the second time will be high.
>
-- After patch --
real 0m1.275s
user 0m0.097s
sys 0m0.160s
real 0m4.063s
user 0m0.663s
sys 0m0.377s
real 0m1.259s
user 0m0.073s
sys 0m0.160s
