"Qingqing Zhou" <zhouqq@cs.toronto.edu> writes:
> "Tom Lane" <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote
>> Hm? I don't see any improvement there:
> I was referening this sentence, though I am not sure why that's the
> expectation:
>> "Bruce Momjian" <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> wrote
>> If the patch worked, the first and third times will be similar, and
>> the second time will be high.
You need to label your results more clearly then. I thought you were
showing us three repeats of the same test, and I gather Bruce thought
so too...
regards, tom lane
