On 2017/11/24 10:57, Craig Ringer wrote:
> On 24 November 2017 at 09:20, atorikoshi
<torikoshi_atsushi_z2@lab.ntt.co.jp
>> wrote:
>
>>
>> Thanks for letting me know.
>> I think I only tested running "make check" at top directory, sorry
>> for my insufficient test.
>>
>> The test failure happened at the beginning of replication(creating
>> slot), so there are no changes yet and getting the tail of changes
>> failed.
>>
>> Because the bug we are fixing only happens after creating files,
>> I've added "txn->serialized" to the if statement condition.
>
>
> Thanks.
>
> Re-reading the patch I see
>
> * The final_lsn of which transaction that hasn't produced an abort
> * record is invalid.
>
> which I find very hard to parse. I suggest:
>
> We set final_lsn when we decode the commit or abort record for a
> transaction,
> but transactions implicitly aborted by a crash never write such a
record.
>
> then continue from there with the same text as in the patch.
>
> Otherwise I'm happy. It passes make check, test decoding and the recovery
> TAP tests too.
>
Thanks for your kind suggestion and running test.
I've added your comment at the beginning.
--
Atsushi Torikoshi
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center
