Re: Spinlock backoff algorithm - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Gregory Maxwell
Subject Re: Spinlock backoff algorithm
Date
Msg-id e692861c0711141922u7ac1f49wc32efc71ccae7f35@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Spinlock backoff algorithm  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Responses Re: Spinlock backoff algorithm  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Re: Spinlock backoff algorithm  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Nov 14, 2007 10:12 PM, Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com> wrote:
> http://www.intel.com/performance/server/xeon/intspd.htm
> http://www.intel.com/performance/server/xeon/fpspeed.htm

That says precisely nothing about the matter at hand. Someone should
simply change it and benchmark it in pgsql. I doubt you'll see a
difference there on regular AMD/Intel ... and if it makes the sun
hyperthreaded cpu happier...


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Steve Atkins
Date:
Subject: Re: Spinlock backoff algorithm
Next
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: Spinlock backoff algorithm