Re: [HACKERS] Failure in commit_ts tap tests - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Failure in commit_ts tap tests
Date
Msg-id e6084b89-07a7-7e57-51ee-d7b8fc9ec864@2ndQuadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Failure in commit_ts tap tests  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Failure in commit_ts tap tests
List pgsql-hackers

On 01/24/2017 03:18 AM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
> On 01/23/2017 09:22 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Andrew Dunstan <andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
>>> On 01/23/2017 09:03 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>>> Andrew Dunstan <andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
>>>>> On 01/20/2017 01:22 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>>>>> It looks like at least part of the answer is that the buildfarm isn't
>>>>>> running this test.  AFAICS, it runs "make installcheck" not
>>>>>> "make check" in src/test/modules.
>>> OK, so should we just change "make installcheck" to "make check"?
>> I'm in favor (just for src/test/modules, to be clear).
>>
>>             
>
>
> Yes. There will be some consequent buildfarm code cleanup, but this will
> test shortly on crake.
>

Well, that crashed. The DDL deparse comment test should not assume that
contrib_regression exists. Possibly it should create it if it doesn't
exist. The buildfarm mostly runs with USE_DB_MODULE=1 so we don't
constantly overwrite the same db.

cheers

andrew

-- 
Andrew Dunstan                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] parallelize queries containing subplans
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Failure in commit_ts tap tests