On Fri, 2025-03-21 at 14:54 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> And nobody has refuted the argument that refusing to
> update the Unicode tables will cause other problems (such as not
> knowing what to do with new code points that are added in the other
> places where those tables are used).
The argument is irrefutable.
I can only utter my (unproven) conviction that the complaints about
some outlandish character being converted to upper case in the wrong
way won't be as loud as the complaints about a corrupted index.
But perhaps both occurrences would be rare enough that there is
little point in arguing at all.
> People who aren't doing the work
> to improve the infrastructure don't get to hold the longstanding
> process hostage.
Actually, I am arguing for *not* doing the work...
Yours,
Laurenz Albe
