On 3/30/07, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> wrote:
> If by destruction you mean something different than pfree, then maybe
> hash_remove in a loop is the best solution, the other idea being passing
> a function pointer to hash_destroy_deep to call on each element, which
> is probably too messy an API.
Yes, callback function is needed, either in HASHCTL or as
argument to deep_free().
> In any case it's not likely that there are going to be thousands of
> prepared statements, so is this really an issue?
I think the issue is here that its very common thing to do,
so open-coding it everywhere is waste, there should be some
utility function for that.
void hash_foreach(HTAB, void (*cb_func)(void *));
--
marko
