On 12/7/16 9:38 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Even with that change, dynamic shared memory is still vulnerable to be
>> removed.
> Really? I thought we concluded that it is safe because it is detectably
> attached to running processes.
The DSM implementation uses POSIX shared memory, which doesn't have an
attachment count like SysV shared memory.
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
