On 1/12/17 09:36, Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
>> On 1/11/17 11:25 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> +1 for the concept, but I'm a bit worried about putting atooid() in
>>> postgres_ext.h. That's going to impose on the namespace of libpq-using
>>> applications, for instance. A more conservative answer would be to
>>> add it to c.h. OTOH, postgres_ext.h is where the Oid typedef lives,
>>> so I do see the consistency of adding this there. Hard choice.
>
>> How about two copies: one in postgres_fe.h and one in postgres.h?
>
> That seems uglier than either of the other choices.
>
> I don't personally have a huge problem with adding atooid in
> postgres_ext.h, but I thought I'd better flag the potential issue
> to see if anyone else thinks it's a big problem.
committed as is then
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
