Re: Table partition for very large table - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Yudie Gunawan
Subject Re: Table partition for very large table
Date
Msg-id e460d0c050328115032b743f9@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Table partition for very large table  (Scott Marlowe <smarlowe@g2switchworks.com>)
Responses Re: Table partition for very large table  (Scott Marlowe <smarlowe@g2switchworks.com>)
Re: Table partition for very large table  (Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org>)
List pgsql-general
> Hold on, let's diagnose the real problem before we look for solutions.
> What does explain <query> tell you?  Have you analyzed the database?


This is the QUERY PLAN
Hash Left Join  (cost=25.00..412868.31 rows=4979686 width=17)
  Hash Cond: (("outer".groupnum = "inner".groupnum) AND
(("outer".sku)::text = ("inner".sku)::text))
  Filter: (("inner".url IS NULL) OR (("inner".url)::text = ''::text))
  ->  Seq Scan on prdt_old mc  (cost=0.00..288349.86 rows=4979686 width=17)
  ->  Hash  (cost=20.00..20.00 rows=1000 width=78)
        ->  Seq Scan on prdt_new mi  (cost=0.00..20.00 rows=1000 width=78)


> What are your postgresql.conf settings?

What suspected specific setting need to be changed?

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "Guy Rouillier"
Date:
Subject: Re: Debugging deadlocks
Next
From: Scott Marlowe
Date:
Subject: Re: Table partition for very large table