"Bruce Momjian" <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> wrote
> >
> > Sorry for the late reply. Maybe more intensive tests are needed? Since
> > this bug seems could not lead data corruption, we can wait till next bug
> > report and let the user test it then decide to apply?
>
> Well we did have a bug report by Peter Brant, and a test by him with the
> patch that fixes it, so it seems it should be applied. The URLs I
> posted had that information.
>
Ok, go ahead. What I am worrying about is to cause bigger trouble than now
... I will watch it if anything unexpected reported.
Regards,
Qingqing
