Re: [HACKERS] Question on win32 semaphore simulation - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Qingqing Zhou
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Question on win32 semaphore simulation
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.58.0605102134540.14978@eon.cs
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Question on win32 semaphore simulation  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Question on win32 semaphore simulation
List pgsql-patches

On Sun, 7 May 2006, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> >
> > Leave 'em alone.  That code has zero field validation, and should
> > certainly not get shipped until it's survived a beta-test cycle.
>
> Uh, this is a bug fix, and the patch I am asking about is not the Win32
> semaphore reimplementation but a more limited fix.

Sorry for the late reply. Maybe more intensive tests are needed? Since
this bug seems could not lead data corruption, we can wait till next bug
report and let the user test it then decide to apply?

Regards,
Qingqing

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Martijn van Oosterhout
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Improve EXPLAIN ANALYZE overhead by sampling
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Question on win32 semaphore simulation