Re: [HACKERS] Question on win32 semaphore simulation - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Question on win32 semaphore simulation
Date
Msg-id 200605110208.k4B28DS04908@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Question on win32 semaphore simulation  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Question on win32 semaphore simulation
List pgsql-patches
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> >> Well we did have a bug report by Peter Brant, and a test by him with the
> >> patch that fixes it, so it seems it should be applied.  The URLs I
> >> posted had that information.
>
> > Correction.  It only goes into 8.0.X and 8.1.X.  CVS HEAD has a
> > rewritten file.
>
> That seems a bit scary --- patching stable branches with a patch that
> will get zero testing in HEAD?  I think some more testing besides
> Peter's would be smart first.  What if the patch behaves differently
> on different versions of Windows, for instance?

We can wait for someone else to report the problem.  I think it only
happened on Win2003 SP1.


--
  Bruce Momjian   http://candle.pha.pa.us
  EnterpriseDB    http://www.enterprisedb.com

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: "Qingqing Zhou"
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Question on win32 semaphore simulation
Next
From: "Luke Lonergan"
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Improve EXPLAIN ANALYZE overhead by