On Tue, Jul 15, 2025, at 09:20, Joel Jacobson wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 13, 2025, at 01:18, Tom Lane wrote:
>> "Joel Jacobson" <joel@compiler.org> writes:
>>> The attached proof-of-concept patch proposes a straightforward
>>> optimization for the single-listener case. It introduces a shared-memory
>>> hash table mapping (dboid, channelname) to the ProcNumber of a single
>>> listener.
>>
>> What does that do to the cost and parallelizability of LISTEN/UNLISTEN?
>
> Good point. The previous patch would effectively force all LISTEN/UNLISTEN
> to be serialized, which would at least hurt parallelizability.
>
> New benchmark confirm this hypothesis.
>
> New patch attached that combines two complementary approaches, that together
> seems to scale well for both common-channel and unique-channel scenarios:
Thanks to the FreeBSD animal failing, I see I made a shared memory blunder.
New squashed patch attached.
/Joel
