Re: should we enable log_checkpoints out of the box? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jan Wieck
Subject Re: should we enable log_checkpoints out of the box?
Date
Msg-id e27e0f31-2593-125d-8580-81bcb17b8377@wi3ck.info
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: should we enable log_checkpoints out of the box?  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 11/2/21 12:09, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 2, 2021 at 8:55 AM Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I think shipping with log_checkpoints=on and
>> log_autovacuum_min_duration=10m or so would be one of the best things
>> we could possibly do to allow ex-post-facto troubleshooting of
>> system-wide performance issues. The idea that users care more about
>> the inconvenience of a handful of extra log messages than they do
>> about being able to find problems when they have them matches no part
>> of my experience. I suspect that many users would be willing to incur
>> *way more* useless log messages than those settings would ever
>> generate if it meant that they could actually find problems when and
>> if they have them.
> 
> I fully agree.
> 

+1

-- 
Jan Wieck



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: make tuplestore helper function
Next
From: Stephen Frost
Date:
Subject: Re: Predefined role pg_maintenance for VACUUM, ANALYZE, CHECKPOINT.