2007/12/16, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>:
> Hannu Krosing <hannu@skype.net> writes:
> > But can't we _define_ such a subset, where we can do a transactionless
> > load ?
>
> Sure ... but you'll find that it's not large enough to be useful.
> Once you remove all the interesting consistency checks such as
> unique indexes and foreign keys, the COPY will tend to go through
> just fine, and then you're still stuck trying to weed out bad data
> without very good tools for it. The only errors we could really
> separate out without subtransaction fencing are extremely trivial
> ones like too many or too few fields on a line ... which can be
> caught with a sed script.
>
I have dump file. I would like to load it ASAP.
Constraints will be applied at the end, so any problem can be detected.
I would like it to be as direct as possible and as bulk as possibe - just
allocate pages and fill them with the data. Maybe it should be different
mode - single user or so. Right now I can save some IO - like turn off
fsync, but that is all :(
I got something like that:
http://www.tbray.org/ongoing/When/200x/2007/10/30/WF-Results
I have no idea how to load single file in many threads, but... the point is
that it can be much faster that single-thread load - surprisingly - at
least for me.
--
Regards, Michał Zaborowski (TeXXaS)
