Re: fix crash with Python 3.11 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Markus Wanner
Subject Re: fix crash with Python 3.11
Date
Msg-id e11b9602-fc7e-cb91-c288-3a99f1bdb6e7@enterprisedb.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: fix crash with Python 3.11  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 6/24/22 00:54, Tom Lane wrote:
> Does such code exist?  I don't see any other calls in Debian code search,
> and I find it hard to believe that anyone would think such a thing is
> maintainable.

Such a thing does exist within PGLogical and BDR, yes.

Thanks for your concern about maintainability. So far, that part was not 
posing any trouble. Looking at e.g. postgres.c, the sigsetjmp handler 
there didn't change all that much in recent years. Much of the code 
there is from around 2004 written by you.

However, that shouldn't be your concern at all. Postgres refusing to 
start after a minor upgrade probably should, especially when it's due to 
an API change in a stable branch.

Regards

Markus



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Aleksander Alekseev
Date:
Subject: Re: CREATE TABLE ( .. STORAGE ..)
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: NAMEDATALEN increase because of non-latin languages