Is there anyway to tell Postgres "Run these two queries, and union their results, but don't change the plan as to a UNION - just run them separately"?
Something seems funny to me that running a UNION should be twice as slow as running the two queries one after the other.
On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 8:10 PM, Robert James
<srobertjames@gmail.com> wrote:
UNION was better, but still 5 times as slow as either query done individually.
set enable_seqscan=off didn't help at all - it was totally ignored
Is there anything else I can do?
On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 7:47 PM, Tom Lane
<tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
Robert James <
srobertjames@gmail.com> writes:
> Hi. I notice that when I do a WHERE x, Postgres uses an index, and when I
> do WHERE y, it does so as well, but when I do WHERE x OR y, it
> doesn't.
conditions...
> select * from dict
> where
> word in (select substr('moon', 0, generate_series(3,length('moon')))) --
> this is my X above
> OR word like 'moon%' -- this is my Y above
... and that one is pretty arbitrary. You might have some luck with
using a UNION instead, viz
select * from dict where X
union all
select * from dict where Y
regards, tom lane
