Re: PostgreSQL 8.1 vs. MySQL 5.0? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Andrus
Subject Re: PostgreSQL 8.1 vs. MySQL 5.0?
Date
Msg-id di5ve8$185j$1@news.hub.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PostgreSQL 8.1 vs. MySQL 5.0?  ("Magnus Hagander" <mha@sollentuna.net>)
List pgsql-general
"Douglas McNaught" <doug@mcnaught.org> wrote in message
news:m2br21zd2l.fsf@Douglas-McNaughts-Powerbook.local...
> "Andrus" <eetasoft@online.ee> writes:
>
>> Apache runs well in Windows 98. Why this is so difficult in native
>> Windows
>> Postgres?
>
> I *think* it's because we use certain features of NTFS, which Win98
> will never support.

Postgres runs also in FAT32 file system , so this cannot be problem.

Problem may be service support.
Apache runs in Windows 98 as usual application, not as service. So this can
be done in Postgres also.

Andrus.



pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: SELECT FOR SHARE
Next
From: "Andrus"
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL 8.1 vs. MySQL 5.0?