Re: Make printtup a bit faster - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andreas Karlsson
Subject Re: Make printtup a bit faster
Date
Msg-id def59c4b-9827-43b9-b7b6-800d712ad94e@proxel.se
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Make printtup a bit faster  (David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Make printtup a bit faster
List pgsql-hackers
On 8/29/24 1:51 PM, David Rowley wrote:
> I had planned to work on this for PG18, but I'd be happy for some
> assistance if you're willing.

I am interested in working on this, unless Andy Fan wants to do this 
work. :) I believe that optimizing the out, in and send functions would 
be worth the pain. I get Tom's objections but I do not think adding a 
small check would add much overhead compared to the gains we can get.

And given that all of in, out and send could be optimized I do not like 
the idea of duplicating all three in the catalog.

David, have you given any thought on the cleanest way to check for if 
the new API or the old is the be used for these functions? If not I can 
figure out something myself, just wondering if you already had something 
in mind.

Andreas




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Greg Sabino Mullane
Date:
Subject: Jargon and acronyms on this mailing list
Next
From: Jeff Davis
Date:
Subject: Re: allowing extensions to control planner behavior