On 2018/11/12 12:59, Tom Lane wrote:
> Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp> writes:
>> On 2018/11/10 7:33, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> I'd argue not, actually. I think there is plausible precedent in
>>> updatable views, where what we use is the defaults associated with the
>>> view, not the underlying table. Correspondingly, what ought to govern
>>> in a partitioned insert is the defaults associated with the table actually
>>> named in the insert command, never mind what its partitions might say.
>>> That is useful for many situations, and it avoids all the logical
>>> inconsistencies you get into if you find that the defaults associated
>>> with some partition would force re-routing elsewhere.
>
>> ...
>> IOW, it might be a good idea to call the ability to set partition-level
>> defaults a deprecated feature?
>
> Not necessarily. They'd apply when you insert directly into a particular
> partition by name.
Yes. Maybe, we should document that the partition default are not honored
when inserting through the parent.
Thanks,
Amit
