Re: linux standard layout - Mailing list pgsql-admin
From | Scott Marlowe |
---|---|
Subject | Re: linux standard layout |
Date | |
Msg-id | dcc563d11003082148m35c75c3bla02a9cb16734b536@mail.gmail.com Whole thread Raw |
In response to | linux standard layout (Ben Kim <bkim@tamu.edu>) |
Responses |
Re: linux standard layout
Re: linux standard layout Re: linux standard layout |
List | pgsql-admin |
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 10:31 PM, Ben Kim <bkim@tamu.edu> wrote: > Dear list, > > I have about 20 postgresql databases, about 3-4 GB in total. > > We are moving them from Solaris/SPARC to a linux based virtual machine. > > I don't like the VMWare environment, but it's not my choice, and assuming > the cpu load is ok, will there be any benefits if I put each database on > separate partitions, vs. simply using the one data directory? What reasoning was given for putting your database server in a virutalizeed environment? > Also, how is using standard rpm, with its standard layout (/var/lib/pgsql, > /usr/lib/pgsql, ...), generally regarded? ( vs. compiling everything ?) Does > anyone think using the rpm is unprofessional or something that only > beginners will do? > > I have someone who opposes the use of standard rpms (even yums) for this > reason. I thought I'd check out how it is received professionally. Sounds like a religious argument. I mostly used packages, unless I can't. (i.e. two different versions on RH at the same time) > I ask the question because sometimes I feel uneasy mixing rpms and source > compilation. Worry more about accidentally having two different versions of the same lib linked to various executables. It's easy to do with things like mysql and apache and php and zlib. > If I compile something from the source, sometimes I see a boundary condition > - like, if I already have DBI from a standard rpm, it expects postgresql > library at a certain location - making me wonder whether I should remove the > DBI rpm and compile it also from the source, or whether I should use > standard rpms for postgresql as well. (DBI may not be a good example.) > > In general I didn't have any problems yet with standard rpms and I can make > the rpms work if there's a problem, but I may be missing something. My advice: put postgresql on its own, powerful, reliable non-virtualized server. Demand that the person who wants to virtualize it justify their decision with more than hand-wavy methodologies. Use packages unless you're on RPM and you need > 1 version of pgsql. Even if you need to compile some tarball against the packages, it's still easier to maintain than to install it all from source.
pgsql-admin by date: