Re: more than 2GB data string save - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Scott Marlowe
Subject Re: more than 2GB data string save
Date
Msg-id dcc563d11002092236r45840889lae2385cf9798bbf8@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: more than 2GB data string save  (Steve Atkins <steve@blighty.com>)
Responses Re: more than 2GB data string save  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-general
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 11:26 PM, Steve Atkins <steve@blighty.com> wrote:
>
> On Feb 9, 2010, at 9:52 PM, Scott Marlowe wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 9:38 PM, AI Rumman <rummandba@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> How to save 2 GB or more text string in Postgresql?
>>> Which data type should I use?
>>
>> If you have to you can use either the lo interface, or you can use
>> bytea.  Large Object (i.e. lo) allows for access much like fopen /
>> fseek  etc in C, but the actual data are not stored in a row with
>> other data, but alone in the lo space.  Bytea is a legit type that you
>> can have as one of many in a row, but you retrieve the whole thing at
>> once when you get the row.
>
> Bytea definitely won't handle more than 1 GB. I don't think the lo interface
> will handle more than 2GB.

That really depends on how compressible it is, doesn't it?

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Steve Atkins
Date:
Subject: Re: more than 2GB data string save
Next
From: AI Rumman
Date:
Subject: Re: more than 2GB data string save