Re: \dt doesn't show all relations in user's schemas (8.4.2) - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Scott Marlowe
Subject Re: \dt doesn't show all relations in user's schemas (8.4.2)
Date
Msg-id dcc563d10912211706q7f1550admfbf59d99f44835d@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: \dt doesn't show all relations in user's schemas (8.4.2)  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: \dt doesn't show all relations in user's schemas (8.4.2)  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-general
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 4:42 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com> writes:
>> So, either the docs for \dt need fixing to reflect reality, or they're
>> right and psql \dt needs fixing.
>
> The documentation says
>
>   Whenever the pattern parameter
>   is omitted completely, the \d commands display all objects
>   that are visible in the current schema search path -- this is
>   equivalent to using the pattern *.
>   To see all objects in the database, use the pattern *.*.
>
> Seems clear enough to me.

Then you should see BOTH tables with the same name in different
schemas, right?  Cause the OP was saying that it picks only the first
one to display.

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Robert Hodges
Date:
Subject: Re: Justifying a PG over MySQL approach to a project
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: \dt doesn't show all relations in user's schemas (8.4.2)