Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Re: Bench marking performance or experience using Solid State Disk Drives (SSD) with postgres - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Scott Marlowe
Subject Re: Re: Bench marking performance or experience using Solid State Disk Drives (SSD) with postgres
Date
Msg-id dcc563d10911052205i14202d74s4d9dde568070477@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Bench marking performance or experience using Solid State Disk Drives (SSD) with postgres  (Stephen Tyler <stephen@stephen-tyler.com>)
Responses Re: Re: Bench marking performance or experience using Solid State Disk Drives (SSD) with postgres  (Stephen Tyler <stephen@stephen-tyler.com>)
List pgsql-general
Tree view 
On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 9:05 PM, Stephen Tyler <stephen@stephen-tyler.com> wrote:
> So far I have encountered zero errors on the SSD drives, and SMART
> status is OK.  The SCSI U320 15K drives have given a few soft errors
> over the past few years.

Have you noticed any fall off in performance as they get re-written a
lot?  I'm wondering just how much of the issues with fragmentation
have been fixed versus just putting the problem further into the
future...

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: John DeSoi
Date:
Subject: Re: MD5 Authentication
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: MD5 Authentication