On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 3:16 PM, bricklen<bricklen@gmail.com> wrote:
> Interesting idea. Preferably this operation could be done in straight SQL in
> a single transaction, to fit in with the way our application works, but if
> that's not possible I may need to go the temporary table route.
Temp tables can be included in a transaction, and they're not visible
to other connections.
